Last October, the ICC once again
changed the rules of the game, especially in limited overs cricket, in the hope
that the pace of the middle overs phase of the game which has been considered a
drag is picked up. Though amending the
rules, in lieu of the changing demands of the game is fair enough, but doing it
frequently can make it really confusing not only for the fans but also the
players.
Lot has been made about the new
rules, saying it has been once again skewed in favour of the batsmen. In view
of that, allowing two bouncers per over is a welcome change. It can test the
batsmen, knowing that there can be one more bouncer which can be bowled at
them.
The rule to implement two new
balls at each end had received a lot of flak, as it would kill reverse swing.
It has been in place for more than a year now, and from what I have observed,
it seems that conventional swing bowlers have really found this rule to their
liking. It would be really interesting to see how the scores have been affected
in the first 15 overs due to this change.
One of the biggest changes has
been the reduction of fielders outside the 30 yard circle from the traditional
five to four fielders. Five fielders outside the circle has been a constant
ever since the ODI game has come into inception and it would have taken a lot
of thought to modify the rule. This rule has received irk from the captains who
have suggested it will be really harsh on the spinners as they won’t have an
extra man on the boundary. Their reservations are valid, but I feel one of the
advantages with this rule is that the captains are forced to be a bit more
attacking. It had almost become a norm that once the powerplay overs were done
with, you had captains placing five fielders on the boundary irrespective of
the fact that a new batsman had come to the crease. The batsmen were ready to
milk the bowlers and get settled and captains were happy to not concede the
boundaries due to which some fans have felt that the middle overs were a drag.
With this new rule, the batsmen
may have to try more attacking strokes to get runs, which can lead to more
wickets. I remember distinctly an ODI in 2006 when Dravid had used the
powerplay to get wickets. Pietersen was in one of his belligerent moods, yet
Dravid opted to take the powerplay. With the field in, Pietersen probably felt
the need to go for one shot too many and in the end he lost his wicket. The
decision could have totally backfired, but what it does show here is that once
the fielders are in, batsmen can feel the urge to over attack and it can lead
to wickets.
I feel this is a positive change,
and it can bring in some more positivity from the captains. The only drawback
with this rule I feel is how the spinners respond. Will they start bowling
flatter or will they toss the ball a lot more to entice the batsmen into a
false stroke. Only time will tell.
There are some changes which the
ICC have to look into as well due to recent developments, that of Steven Finn.
He has a terrible habit of knocking the stumps down during his delivery stride,
and it has led to umpires declaring it as a dead ball if the act has been
performed repeatedly. It really would be annoying for the batting team if the
ball is declared a dead ball when they have hit it for a four or six. It can
make a big difference to the result. Probably a bowler can be given a warning,
and the next offence can be marked as a no-ball. It is important a rule is
created, so as to standardize the decision wherever the game is played.
With the game being heavily in
favour of the batsmen, probably there is a case of allowing one bowler to bowl
12 overs instead of the stipulated 10. In the age of heavy bats, flat decks and
shorter boundaries, there definitely should be some rules to please the bowlers
as well! Whatever said and done, the ICC has to ensure the rules aren’t changed
constantly, as it really hard for the followers to keep track of every change
being made!